How far did RE6 really get them? It damn near almost cost them the company. It cost a BUNCH of money and that AAA hardcore crowd has moved on ,resulting in them over spending on something that wasn't wanted by the majority, ie they spent Assassins Creed money ,yet didn't get Assassin's Creed sales.Ī shame too as I feel Capcom could still have a profitable business model if they just scale back, focus on core IPs and core concepts and seek respectable returns, not HUGE AAA ACTION BLOCKBUSTER risk. They lost likely lots of conusmers doing such a style, yet earned the AAA hardcore crowd, yet what happened with 6? Not bad games, but not RE titles by what fans understand the concept to be.

They have sunk low based on titles like RE4, RE5 and RE6. Even a game like Resident Evil Code Veronica only sold like a little over 2 million (mind you that is combining DC and PS2 numbers) how on Earth have they sunk so low?'ĭMC only averaged low millions like 2 or so, DMC4 being the height of the series at 3 million. 'experiencing Resident Evil for the first time at a friend's house on the ps1 to being blown away by the DMC demo that came bundled with Code Veronica. Longer may not make the game better, merely means longer. I mean.I don't know how long this game was in development to actually say they are in the wrong. 'didn't Capcom's CEO in their last earnings statement talk about how they will only release games when they are ready even if that means them taking longer with development?'

Umbrella corps ps4